Home » Post Item » Mr. Mike’s MGM Gift

Mr. Mike’s MGM Gift

April 1, 2005

The Philippine Star reports GMA (Ginoong Mike Arroyo) as saying:

“I challenge anyone to call MGM. It was an accommodation fitting a dignitary, my stature as husband of a President. I don’t know, what’s the fuss all about? Masama ba yung libre (Is there anything wrong with free accommodation)?” Mr. Arroyo asked.

Mr. Arroyo claimed his friends originally wanted to pay for his room. But instead, he said, “MGM gave it to me (for free).”

I’m not an expert but does the following provision of Presidential Decree No. 46 apply? That law makes it punishable:

for any public official or employee, whether of the national or local governments, to receive, directly or indirectly, and for private persons to give, or offer to give, any gift, present or other valuable thing to any occasion, including Christmas, when such gift, present or other valuable thing is given by reason of his official position, regardless of whether or not the same is for past favor or favors or the giver hopes or expects to receive a favor or better treatment in the future from the public official or employee concerned in the discharge of his official functions. Included within the prohibition is the throwing of parties or entertainments in honor of the official or employees or his immediate relatives.

It seems clear to me that the First Gentleman’s statement might implicate “his friends” who wanted to pay for the room since it may be viewed as indirectly giving a gift to the President. So those guys may be liable.

I wonder if MGM has violated the law by actually giving the gift to Mr. Arroyo. Maybe not since MGM can argue that Philippine criminal statutes do not apply in the US. Besides, how can Philippine courts enforce its conviction order against MGM and its employees? But the President may be liable for indirectly receiving the gift since it benefits her spouse in which case, she might be liable.

I seem to recall that Manny Pacquiao gave 4 tickets to Mr. Arroyo’s group to watch the fight. I wonder whether that gift may put Pacquiao into prison.

The bottom line is that Mr. Arroyo should refrain from receiving gifts of any kind from any person. While he may be personally insulated from criminal liability, he exposes his wife and the gift-giver to criminal prosecution. After all, he’s a lawyer and he knows the risk he’s putting himself through.

Posted by JJ Disini at 11:48 am | permalink

Previous Comments

I have heard Erap signed that one to be enacted. Since you love irony, the first one to make it was the first one to break it. He let his barber flew to Hong Kong :) Anyways, Mr. Arroyo should have avoided it even if it was free.

Posted by Franc at April 2, 2005, 11:28 pm

All comments are moderated. Your comments will not appear here unless approved by the blog owner. Thank you.

Add a comment